← Search

Chris Barcklow

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Asheville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 21W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
W
2026-05-30 · WNCR Talley (Etowah) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Shuler championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · WNCR Talley (Etowah) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carl M Erikson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · WNCR Talley (Etowah) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Shuler
loading the estimate
8-9
L
2026-04-25 · WNCR Talley (Etowah) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Shuler
loading the estimate
8-9
L
2026-04-12 · WNCJ Futch (Etowah) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Jochetz
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · WNCJ Futch (Etowah) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Futch
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-08 · WNCR Talley (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Downing
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
8-3
L
2025-05-08 · WNCR Talley (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Downing
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-8
L
2024-05-23 · WNCC Barcklow (Crowne) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Craig Wassenberg
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-05 · WNCR Talley (Crowne) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Shuler
loading the estimate
8-3
W
2024-05-05 · WNCR Talley (Crowne) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffrey Shuler
loading the estimate
8-2
W
2024-05-02 · WNCC Barcklow (Crowne) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Robinson
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
60%
12W–8L · 51.2% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.4% of games
9.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal