← Search

Phillip Sweeney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nicasio, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history44 matches
L
2025-04-11 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ricky Mason
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-20 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-12 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-04-10 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Engstrom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-07 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Engstrom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-5
L
2023-05-07 · MT TAM RC 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Akay
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-22 · MT TAM RC 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Egan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-08 · MT TAM RC 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-04-06 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-03-31 · MT TAM RC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlos Lamas-Babbini
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-03-25 · MT TAM RC 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Egan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2022-05-21 · MT TAM RC 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Gumbiner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.5% of games
7.0
25%
4W–12L · 43.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova