← Search

Mary Brand

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Grand Island, NE
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 8W–3L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history11 matches
W
2024-07-02 · Powell Mandigo/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Strawhecker
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-25 · Powell Mandigo/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Strawhecker
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-06-11 · Powell Mandigo/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalla Powell Mandigo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-05-14 · Powell Mandigo/Johnson · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-04-30 · Powell Mandigo/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Schultz
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2021-03-26 · Team TriCity · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with JP Jamison mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-03-05 · Team TriCity · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JP Jamison mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2019-07-07 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Brand mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2019-06-02 · Strawhecker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Brand mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2019-05-05 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Brand mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2019-05-05 · Strawhecker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Brand mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams