← Search

Jane ODonnell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glastonbury, CT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 31W–61L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history92 matches
L
2025-08-05 · GTC:Prime Timers:May/L'Heureux · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luz Fischer-Flores
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-10 · GTC:Prime Timers:May/L'Heureux · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Sutton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-13 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn Cromwell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-09 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Salinas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-19 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robyn Sondak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-11-24 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn Cromwell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-15 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Nadeau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-21 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luz Fischer-Flores
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-05 · GTC:Deuce Divas:L’Heureux/Zurcher · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Bonaiuto
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-25 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Zurcher
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-01-14 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Salinas
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-14 · GTC:Deuce Divas:L’Heureux/Zurcher · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Ryan
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2025
GTC:Prime Timers:May/L'Heureux
2025 NCT Adult 65 & Over Women · 6.0 65 & Older Women 1/2 · 65+
2025
GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/
2025 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women 1/3 · 55+
2025
GTC:Deuce Divas:L’Heureux/Zurcher
2024 NCT Adult 40 & Over Day Women · 3.0 Women 1/6 · 40+
2024
GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell
2024 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women 1/3 · 55+
2024
GTC:Deuce Divas:L’Heureux/Zurcher
2023 NCT Adult 40 & Over Day Women · 3.0 Women · 40+
2023
GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell
2023 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women 1/5 · 55+
2023
GTC:Stingers:Genovesi/Mabe
2023 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women · 18+
2023
GTC:Deuce Divas:L'Heureux/Zurcher
2022 NCT Adult 40 & Over Day Women · 3.0 Women · 40+
2022
GTC:Queens of the Court:Mabe
2021 NCT Tri Level Women · 3.0 Women
2022
GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell
2022 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women 1/5 · 55+
2022
GTC:Stingers:Genovesi/Mabe
2022 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women · 18+
2022
GTC:Summer Stringers:Mabe/Ramm
2022 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women · 18+
2022
GTC:Net Gains:Bonin
2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.5 Women 1/7 · 18+
2021
GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/Odonnell
2021 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women Div 1/3 · 55+
2021
GTC:Stingers:Genovesi/Mabe
2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women · 18+
2021
GTC:Stingers:Mabe
2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women 1/9 · 18+
2021
GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/O'Donnell
2020 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women Div 1/3 · 55+
2020
GTC:Stingers:Mabe/Gardner
2020 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women · 18+
2020
GTC:Petal Pushers:Hale
2019 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women Div 1/9 · 55+
2019
GTC:Stingers:Hale
2019 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women · 18+
2019
GTC:Stingers:Mabe
2019 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women Div 1/11 · 18+
2019
NTC:Racquet Science:LaRocque
2019 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women Div 1/3 · 55+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40.4%
21W–31L · 45.3% of games
6.0
25.6%
10W–29L · 39.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova