Kimberly Strachan
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, MI
406 matches · 257W–149L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history406 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2019–2026
BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 4.0 NW F1
BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F
BHC-Strachan 7.5W Weekend Combo F
BRC-Endrud 40s 4.0 NW F3
BRC-Jacobson 18s 4.0 DW F
PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F
PINE-Raab (outside) 40s 4.0 DW F
PINE-Refka 8.5W Weekend Combo F
PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX
TROY-Strachan 4.0W Fall Singles F
TROY-Strachan Tri MED Women F
TROY-Strachan WOMEN winter SINGLES F
WESS-Brown 40&O 70 Mix F
WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F
WESS-Palarz 40&O 80 Mix
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.3% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
28W–0L · 78.4% of games
4.0
68.1%
139W–65L · 58.2% of games
4.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 30.4% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 71.9% of games
7.5
68%
17W–8L · 56.4% of games
8.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.3% of games
8.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 45.4% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
189 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
43 matches
#2 Singles
9%
35 matches
#3 Singles
2%
7 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.