← Search

Tarina Mendes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seneca, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 84W–109L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history193 matches
W
2026-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elena Claus championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elena Claus championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim McKinney championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-21 · UPTA54FF/Mendes/Spindletree · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacquie Eddy
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-07 · UPTA54FF/Mendes/Spindletree · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacquie Eddy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-30 · UPTA54FF/Mendes/Spindletree · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Ashley
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-23 · UPTA55C/Johnson/Spindletree · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Maly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-21 · UPTA65C/Johnson/Spindletree · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patti Kortenber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-16 · UPTA55C/Johnson/Spindletree · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim McKinney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-10 · FTA55C/Spindletree/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Blalock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-09 · UPTA55C/Cain/Spindletree · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Feinstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · UPTA55C/Johnson/Spindletree · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Maly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.6% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games
3.5
60%
27W–18L · 54% of games
4.0
20.4%
10W–39L · 37.9% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
7.5
48.2%
27W–29L · 50% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
27 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert