← Search

George Balch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Laguna Niguel, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 33W–12L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
L
2026-10-17 · OC RCI - Michael · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Venter
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-20 · OC RCI - Michael · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken MacLin
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · OC RCI - Michael · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dean Corley
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · OC RCI - Michael · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pablo Moreno
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-26 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Gagnon
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sorin Alexanian
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-02-12 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Bauersfeld
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-05 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Gagnon
loading the estimate
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-22 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Gagnon
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-15 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-08 · CV-LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfeld · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Gagnon
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-03-20 · CV LLW-Indian Ridge CC/Smith & Bauersfield · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Gagnon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
7.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 60.7% of games
8.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams