← Search

Amanda Reynolds

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 44W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-09-21 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bobbie Westrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stanley Marrow mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Roach
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Bethel/Priest 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stanley Marrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · Strader 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stanley Marrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · Bethel/Priest 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stanley Marrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-04 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 4.0W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Kroeger
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Warrick 40s 4.0W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Goodman
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Warrick 40s 4.0W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Yates
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-09 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 4.0W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Yates
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-08-23 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5 Combo W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Kemp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
60%
24W–16L · 53.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 26.3% of games
7.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 41.6% of games
8.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 35.4% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe