← Search

Christine Fleige

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel Valley, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 22W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
W
2026-07-11 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephanie Scattini championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Ravalin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Lyssy Haase
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephanie Scattini
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Default
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lauren Lyssy Haase
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-14 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Ravalin
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Ravalin
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-17 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Ravalin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-19 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brenda Berke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-05-19 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Ravalin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-05-18 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Ravalin
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-04-06 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Margaret Hudson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.7% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 46.5% of games
9.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
45%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer