← Search

Shannon Gleave

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenix, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
402 matches · 167W–235L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history402 matches
L
2026-10-28 · 3.5 PTC1 Jaquess W40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deana Perrin
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-25 · 3.5 PTC2 Jaquess X40F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Ruble mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-21 · 3.5 PTC1 Jaquess W40F · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-20 · 4.0 PAS2 LeWin W18F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-18 · 3.5 PTC2 Jaquess X40F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Ruble mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-14 · 3.5 PTC1 Jaquess W40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Denaro
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-13 · 4.0 PAS2 LeWin W18F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-30 · 3.5 PTC1 Jaquess W40F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Denaro
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-23 · 3.5 PTC1 Jaquess W40F · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-5
L
2026-09-15 · 4.0 PAS2 LeWin W18F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · 3.5 PTC2 Jaquess X40F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Kosnik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · 4.0 PAS2 LeWin W18F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.2% of games
3.5
45.5%
50W–60L · 50.4% of games
4.0
27.4%
40W–106L · 40.8% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.5% of games
3.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
61.7%
50W–31L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 30.2% of games
8.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
138 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
122 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
113 matches
#2 Singles
5%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer