← Search

Brian Scott

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GREAT FALLS, MT
3.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
26 matches · 3W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-09-20 · Helena/Great Falls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-19 · Helena/Great Falls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-19 · Helena/Great Falls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · Helena/Great Falls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · MT Blend · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-02-28 · MT Blend · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-28 · MT Blend · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · MT Blend · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-02 · Billings · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-02 · Billings · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-01 · Montana/Desin/18&Over7.0MX · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Beck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-01 · Billings · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Scott mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 35% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 21% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams