← Search

Elizabeth Fuller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HILLIARD, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 32W–23L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history55 matches
L
2025-07-12 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Night Rush -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kettlie Daniels
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Night Rush -TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Kampfer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-3
L
2025-06-24 · NWO 55&Over 6.0W Tolson-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Pokrzywa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-17 · NWO 55&Over 6.0W Tolson-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-06-05 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Night Rush -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kettlie Daniels
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-24 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Rush-TWOS · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Kampfer
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2024-05-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Rush-TWOS · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Kampfer
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-31 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kampfer- TWOS · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-17 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kampfer- TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Hartman
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-05-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Rush-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Kampfer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2023-05-10 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kampfer- TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Bakerfink
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-08-03 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kampfer/Bastas-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Bakerfink
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 54.2% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
23 matches
#1 Singles
22%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal