← Search

Val Otto

Kennewick, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 33W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Val Otto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-04-12 · EW-CBRC-Knox · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · EW-CBRC-Knox · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-10 · EW-CBRC-Knox · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-18 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Signe White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-18 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Inman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Signe White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-17 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynne Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-17 · PC - Otto · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolene Boughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-17 · PC - Otto · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sondra Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-16 · PC - Otto · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Inman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-23 · PC-Holle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
25.7%
9W–26L · 43.5% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal