Linda van Goor
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
65 matches · 27W–38L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history65 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2025
Refunded w credit
Refunded w credit
7.0 DCRV GoldenWright W65F
7.0 ISP Sunshine W70S
7.0 VDCR GoldenWright W65S
7.0 DCRV JensenVanGoor W65F
7.0 DCRV JensenVanGoor W65S
7.5 DCRV Shurtz TueAM
7.0 DCRV JenVanG W65F
7.0 DCRV JensVanG W65S
8.0 ISP Peebles W65S
6.0 SRP Howell W65F
7.0 DCRV Jensen/VanGoor W65S
7.0 ISP Cardinali W55S
7.0 SRP Hall/Werzynsky W65F
8.0 ISP Peebles/Echard W65S
3.5 DCVil Hall dF
3.5 DCVill Hall 18eaF
3.5 DCVill Hall dayS
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 44.5% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
53.3%
24W–21L · 50.2% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.