← Search

Sharon Gartner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 51W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history104 matches
L
2026-03-23 · Desert Gems · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-02 · Desert Gems · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-23 · Desert Gems · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-16 · Desert Gems · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Ingold
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-02 · Desert Gems · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-19 · Prickly Pairs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Ingold
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-14 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-01-12 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Lorch
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-15 · Prickly Pairs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-12-01 · Prickly Pairs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-17 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
45%
9W–11L · 52.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52.2%
35W–32L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams