← Search

Margaret Elberson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 84W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history120 matches
W
2026-09-30 · Hammack/40/8.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meg Frazier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-23 · Hammack/40/8.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brandy Hayse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · Lauseng/18/4.5/MXD/BTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Floyd mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · Lauseng/18/4.5/MXD/BTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suren Visvanathan mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · Lauseng/18/4.5/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suren Visvanathan mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · Elberson/40/4.5/MXD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stevie Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Lauseng/18/4.5/MXD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Floyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Elberson/40/4.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stevie Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · Lauseng/18/4.5/MXD/BTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Floyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · Elberson/40/4.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stevie Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Lauseng/18/4.5/MXD/BTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc Paz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · Elberson/40/4.5/MXD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stevie Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 62.9% of games
8.5
80%
12W–3L · 60.8% of games
4.5mixed
76%
19W–6L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
67.5%
27W–13L · 59.2% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
32 matches
Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer