← Search

Jeanne Jones

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newnan, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 13W–13L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-09-21 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Majestic
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-13 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Bridges
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Knox
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-25 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Nolen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Majestic
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Skinner
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-12 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Knox
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paige Winters
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · Chata/Elizabeth Willimon · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kami Adams
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-12 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Cochran
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-11 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Cochran
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-05 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Updegrove
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova