← Search

MICHAEL REED

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Valley City, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 17W–30L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history47 matches
L
2024-07-23 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McCans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-09 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McLane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-24 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Milan Dayalal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-18 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McCans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-06-11 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Deimling
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-04 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McCans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-28 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Wolfe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-15 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Wolfe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-14 · A55 7.0M PM Reed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Nickley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-07-18 · A40 3.5M PM Welsh · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Kabak
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2023-07-11 · A40 3.5M PM Welsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Kabak
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-27 · A40 3.5M PM Welsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Welsh
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60%
9W–6L · 51.4% of games
7.0
25%
8W–24L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe