← Search

Adrian Stanton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lusby, MD
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 5W–20L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-05-31 · Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Chan mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-23 · Romanek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Leimbach mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Taylor · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Hook mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-02 · Romanek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Romanek mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-29 · Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Hook mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · Romanek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marissa Romanek mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · Chan/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Egeli mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-27 · Chan/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Burghardt mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · Chan/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Burghardt mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-01 · Taylor · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Hook mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-05-14 · Taylor · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Casey MCFANN mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-24 · Romanek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Romanek mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
18.2%
4W–18L · 31.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal