← Search

Erica Bramlet

DENVER, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 85W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erica Bramlet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-08-25 · CP RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · SS-LGT GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Whitman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · CP RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aubrey Zahuranec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · SS-LGT GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jared Balcavage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · CP RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · SS-LGT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nimesh Shrestha mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · SS-LGT GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Whitman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-26 · CP BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · CP BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trevor Updegraff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · CP BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-14 · CP BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
60.9%
39W–25L · 53.4% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71%
22W–9L · 56.9% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.1% of games
9.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 52.9% of games
9.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Singles
25%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams