← Search

Ryan Blumkin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Omaha, NE
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 9W–6L · seasons 2021–2023
Match history15 matches
L
2023-07-05 · NE/Betts/18&over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fletcher Kuper
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2023-06-25 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lindsay Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-06-17 · NE/Betts/18&over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabriel Cortinas
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-06-11 · Slezak · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lindsay Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-20 · NE/Betts/18&over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabriel Cortinas
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-07-31 · NE/Slezak/Petersen/18&Over9.0MXD · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kelsie Buckley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2022-07-20 · NE/Slezak/Petersen/18&Over9.0MXD · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brittni Redding mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-26 · NE/Slezak/Petersen/18&Over9.0MXD · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kelsie Buckley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-08-01 · Slezak · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jessica Slezak mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2021-07-11 · Slezak · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lindsay Clayton mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2021-06-18 · NE/Erwin/18&OverMXD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Southard mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2021-06-13 · Slezak · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sheryl Vaughn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams