← Search

Julie Mathis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 18W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-07 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Kirsch
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Stack
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Ageless Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rita Wilson
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rita Wilson
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rita Wilson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Floy Pease
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maripat Rafferty
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-14 · Silver Slammers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Marie Fallek
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · Ageless Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Floy Pease
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
W
2025-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Floy Pease
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Floy Pease
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
22.5%
9W–31L · 41.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams