← Search

Tamarah Hagen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greer, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 42W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history107 matches
W
2026-10-26 · UPTA 40FF/ButlerSprings/Hagler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monika Franz
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-12 · UPTA 40FF/ButlerSprings/Hagler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Tuttle
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-01 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natilee Falk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-23 · UPTA55C/Cousins/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Demosthenes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-10 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natilee Falk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-03 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura McNeel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-02 · UPTA55C/Cousins/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Keriazakos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-27 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeannie Roberts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-12 · UPTA55C/Cousins/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wanda Cummins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · UPTA (A) 4.0W 40 & Over (Hagler) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Haas
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · UPTA (A) 4.0W 40 & Over (Hagler) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Rabel
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · UPTA (A) 4.0W 40 & Over (Hagler) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Burnette
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 47.8% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.1% of games
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 51.8% of games
4.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 42.6% of games
7.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.3% of games
8.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.3% of games
4.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#1 Singles
22%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova