← Search

Nancy Whitman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 5W–28L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history33 matches
L
2024-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Vick
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teruko Blackburn
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-04-21 · Burch/LF 65&over · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Weatherl
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-10 · Burch/LF 65&over · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lizbeth Burch
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-24 · Burch/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Turner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-21 · Burch/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Turner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-07 · Burch/LF 65&over · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trenna Strauss
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-23 · Burch/LF 65&over · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Gelwick
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-13 · Burch/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Estes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-04-30 · Burch/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Turner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-24 · Burch/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Estes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-04-10 · Burch/LF 65&over · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kitty Morel
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
16.1%
5W–26L · 32.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 82% of the time
#3 Doubles
82%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal