← Search

Mark Curin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Easley, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
248 matches · 110W–138L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history248 matches
W
2026-10-03 · UPTA65C/Cooper/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-27 · UPTA40C/Wilson/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Troso
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-23 · UPTA40C/Wilson/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Brock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · UPTA40C/Markham/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Boyce Markham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-20 · UPTA65C/Cooper/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · UPTA55C/Cooper/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lucien Woorons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · UPTA65C/Cooper/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lucien Woorons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · UPTA40C/Markham/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Boyce Markham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-20 · UPTA55C/Cooper/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lucien Woorons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · UPTA55C/Cooper/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · UPTA65C/Cooper/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bruce Brenkus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · UPTA55C/Wright/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Woodall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.6% of games
3.5
85.3%
29W–5L · 60.5% of games
4.0
26.9%
25W–68L · 41.9% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46% of games
7.5
44.4%
24W–30L · 48.7% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer