← Search

Charlotte Parks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oxford, MS
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 19W–21L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history40 matches
L
2025-06-10 · Oxford/Oswalt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shuler Griffin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-04-16 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Gold
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-04-14 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Gold
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-07 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Gold
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2024-04-04 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Semmes van Brocklin
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-03-24 · Ferguson - Oxford - NC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Semmes van Brocklin
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-04-01 · Ferguson /Oxford 55+ 4.0 - Oxford - FNC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Gold
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-01 · Ferguson /Oxford 55+ 4.0 - Oxford - FNC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecilia Gold
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2021-09-27 · Ferguson-Oxford · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marylyle Boolos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-09-12 · Ferguson-Oxford · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Gantz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-19 · CCO Serve Me A Double · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Millie Wright
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-05-19 · CCO Serve Me A Double · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Millie Wright
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 60.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.3% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#2 Singles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe