← Search

Robbyn Whitlock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tryon, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 64W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-28 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beate Madden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cynthia Beane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-29 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erica Roberts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cindy Bull
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · WNCS Naff-Mlo (ARC South) · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Naff Mlo championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · WNCS Naff-Mlo (ARC South) · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Naff Mlo championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · WNCS Naff-Mlo (ARC South) · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill McIntyre championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · WNCC Beane (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lane Perry championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-1
W
2026-05-30 · WNCC Beane (ARC South) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Beane championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · WNCC Beane (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Mooney championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · WNCC Beane (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Mooney championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · WNCC Beane (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Mooney
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
55.9%
19W–15L · 56.8% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.5% of games
8.5
61.4%
27W–17L · 54.6% of games
9.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 71.8% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova