← Search

Iris Kramer-Alcorn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Needham, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 109W–87L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history196 matches
W
2026-09-27 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Buckler championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Buckler championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Beggan championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Buckler championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · LFW:Longfellow Legends:Kottler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Buckler championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-30 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elisabeth Harris
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Beggan
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · LFW:Longfellow Legends:Kottler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy Buckler
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
Default
2026-07-06 · LFW:Longfellow Legends:Kottler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elisabeth Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · W109:Racq Pack:Broderick/Patel · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.5%
48W–40L · 52.4% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
56.4%
22W–17L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
40.5%
15W–22L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Singles
12%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams