← Search

Brock Horsley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 13W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history33 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Pe.Broughton18M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Edgerton mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · Pe.Broughton18M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Quinn mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · Pe.Broughton18M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Ann Novak mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-31 · Pe.Broughton18M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Liu mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · Pe.Broughton18M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Liu mixed
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-05-04 · To.Mendoza18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Colvard
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-04-27 · To.Mendoza18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Leonard
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-06 · To.Mendoza18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Luise
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-03-21 · To.Mendoza18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Sutton
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-16 · To.Mendoza18A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Mendoza
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-12 · 4-KGreen-Eno · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Becki Cleveland mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-06-28 · 4-KGreen-Eno · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeannette Brown mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 42% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer