← Search

Rodney Hinze

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 5W–16L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history21 matches
L
2025-03-22 · Brookhaven/Phelan-Hashimoto M4.5 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-22 · Brookhaven/Phelan-Hashimoto M4.5 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-01-25 · Brookhaven/Phelan-Hashimoto M4.5 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-01-18 · Brookhaven/Phelan-Hashimoto M4.5 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-03-02 · Fretz/Perkison-Valdez M. OPEN · #1 Doubles · with Robert Novotny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-24 · Fretz/Perkison-Valdez M. OPEN · #2 Doubles · with Michael Fahey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-01-28 · Fretz/Perkison-Valdez M. OPEN · #2 Doubles · with Robert Rubel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-27 · Fretz/Perkison-Valdez M. OPEN · #1 Singles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2022-10-22 · Gleneagles/Collins M5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-10-22 · Gleneagles/Collins M5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-01 · Gleneagles/Collins M5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2022-09-24 · Gleneagles/Collins M5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games
5.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 76% of the time
#1 Singles
76%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams