← Search

Marilyn Richmond

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Winter Haven, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 44W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history114 matches
L
2026-10-27 · WH City/Tardy · #4 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Debra Summers
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
Kristin Pennewell / Katie Petersen
2026-10-13 · WH City/Tardy · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Marcia Whitney
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · WH City/Tardy · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Karen Evans
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-29 · WH City/Tardy · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Debra Summers
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-22 · WH City/Tardy · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Debra Summers
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-08 · WH City/Tardy · #5 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Adriana G.Daunt
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Winter Haven City/ Tardy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Evans
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-19 · Winter Haven City/ Tardy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Jarrett
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-12 · Winter Haven City/ Tardy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Jarrett
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Winter Haven City/ Tardy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Jarrett
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Winter Haven City/ Tardy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Jarrett
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-10 · WH City 3.0 2026 - G. Tardy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cruze
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 50.6% of games
3.0
37.5%
12W–20L · 49.3% of games
3.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 43.4% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.7% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.1% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.9% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#3 Female Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#5 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe