← Search

Judy Tabar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Guilford, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 29W–32L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history61 matches
L
2026-10-18 · GF: Slice Sisters: Rieger/Tendler · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arlys Raymond
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-03 · GF: Slice Sisters: Rieger/Tendler · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Black
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maira Rieger
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Brissette
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kate Lee
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Brissette
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · GF: String Sisters: Rieger/Boyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Black
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · GF:Slice Sisters:Rieger/Tendler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Baumgaertner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-05 · GF:Slice Sisters:Rieger/Tendler · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Haren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-12-03 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-11-17 · GF:Ad-Vintage:Rieger/Tendler · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Haren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-11-12 · GF:String Sisters:Rieger/Boyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Roberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
25W–25L · 46.8% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer