Search

Marie MacKey

Charleston, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
107 matches · 42W–65L · seasons 20192025
Where Marie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Marie is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marie has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Marie has gone from the 5th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
39.5%
17W–26L · 45.2% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.7% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
W
Mary Zubrinsky / Lauren Crary
2025-12-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Pernell
+0.034better than expected — took 57% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Megan White / CHELSEA BURKE
2025-11-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Donahue
0.043below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Tiffany Bartholf / Teresa McKellar
2025-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Donahue
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Stephenie Kannon / Mindy Spring
2025-09-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Becker
+0.077better than expected — took 60% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Megan Christian / Amy Jacobychamps
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · with Allyson Priddy
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Karen Gentile / Marissa Regan
2025-09-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Jenkins
0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Suzie Smith / Kelly Kruse
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Jenkins
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Rachel Kohler / Marcia Dickman
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Savannah Wilhelm
0.014below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Na Jin Seo / Katie Donahue
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Zhang
+0.050better than expected — took 65% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Jaeger
0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Kelly
0.008below expectation — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Tsutsumoto
+0.025about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.