← Search

Mary O'Grady

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
East Northport, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 1W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-08-04 · HIT, Peiffer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-02 · HIT, Peiffer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-4
L
2025-08-11 · Huntington, Peiffer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-21 · Huntington, Peiffer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-08 · Huntington, Peiffer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-19 · Huntington, Peiffer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-10 · Huntington, Peiffer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
L
2024-08-20 · Huntington, Peiffer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-08-01 · Huntington, Peiffer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-18 · Huntington, Peiffer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-27 · Huntington, Peiffer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Peiffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
46%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe