← Search

Julie Anderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 57W–108L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history165 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Team 16 Gleneagles/Shores W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Stevens
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-11-01 · Team 15 Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corrie Shores
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · Team 16 Gleneagles/Shores W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Peters
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-10-16 · Team 16 Gleneagles/Shores W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Ellingson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-11 · Team 15 Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cannon
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · Team 16 Gleneagles/Shores W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Matthews
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · Team 15 Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Chapman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · Team 16 Gleneagles/Shores W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Valente
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-13 · Team 15 Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with LORI BOEDING
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · Gleneagles/Shores-Chapman W3.0T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Ellingson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · Gleneagles/Anderson W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cannon
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-11 · Gleneagles/Shores-Chapman W3.0T · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Ellingson
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40.1%
55W–82L · 46.7% of games
3.5
4%
1W–24L · 29.1% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#1 Singles
16%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert