← Search

Jane Coffey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 99W–132L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history231 matches
W
2026-10-10 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · VTC-Schroeder (indoor) 65s 7.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Petra Schroeder
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · HV- Reece 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Gramprie
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · VTC-Schroeder (indoor) 65s 7.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Petra Schroeder
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · VTC-Sella-Armstrong (outdoor) 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeeyeon Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Gramprie
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · VTC-Schroeder (indoor) 65s 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Green
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · HV- Reece 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Gramprie
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · VTC-Schroeder (indoor) 65s 7.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Petra Schroeder
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · HV- Reece 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Haessler
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Connie Nelson
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-11 · HV- Reece 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joy Fried
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.2% of games
3.5
42.1%
32W–44L · 47.6% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.8% of games
7.0
47.8%
32W–35L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
15W–45L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
35 matches
#3 Singles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer