← Search

Peter Hart

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, ME
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
23 matches · 18W–5L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history23 matches
L
2026-09-18 · Apex:OldGuys:Woods · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Buxton championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · Apex:OldGuys:Woods · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Buxton
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
Default
2026-04-25 · Apex:OldGuys:Woods · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Buxton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-12 · Apex:OldGuys:Woods · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Chadbourne
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Apex:OldGuys:Woods · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Buxton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-07-19 · APEX:Watson:Watson/ · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brad Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-19 · APEX:Watson:Watson/ · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brad Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-12-09 · Apex:Nor'Easters:Mackenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Kelly-Brewster mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-07 · Apex:Nor'Easters:Mackenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Glanville mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-10-07 · Apex:Nor'Easters:Mackenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Kelly-Brewster mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-02 · NewEngland/Archilbald/AD55-9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eric Nixon
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-10-02 · NewEngland/Archilbald/AD55-9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eric Nixon
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
9W–0L · 68.6% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 67% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer