← Search

Pat Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simi Valley, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 78W–126L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history204 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Sunset Hills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thanh Nguyen
loading the estimate
3-1
W
2026-10-10 · Sunset Hills · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sid Bhargava
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-09-26 · Sunset Hills · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Toone
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sid Bhargava
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-09 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darryl Heller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Lorentzen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thanh Nguyen
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sid Bhargava
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-09 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darryl Heller
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · Sunset Hills How Did We Get This Old? · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thanh Nguyen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-04 · Sunset Hills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sid Bhargava
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-26 · Sunset Hills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Dyer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
46.9%
23W–26L · 50.6% of games
4.5
33.3%
20W–40L · 42.8% of games
8.0
50%
16W–16L · 50% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 53.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
14W–21L · 47.6% of games
9.0mixed
15%
3W–17L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer