Aimee Bruno
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Arecibo, PR
33 matches · 19W–14L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history33 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.8% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.6% of games
9.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.