← Search

Shaner Garner Crooke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gulf Breeze, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 77W–80L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history157 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MO - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jami Steinmetz championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-12 · MO - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jami Steinmetz championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · MO - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jami Steinmetz championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · MO - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jami Steinmetz championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
Default
2026-09-10 · Crooke - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tyson Dunkelberger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-02 · Schluter - SHL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jami Steinmetz
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Crooke - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Louis Harper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Crooke - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug Gonterman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Covell - RS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsey McIntosh
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-02 · Covell - RS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Covell
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · Crooke - SHL · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tyson Dunkelberger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-20 · Crooke - SHL · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.8% of games
4.5
61%
25W–16L · 52.5% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.5% of games
9.5
0%
0W–6L · 44.1% of games
8.0mixed
59.6%
34W–23L · 52.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
42 matches
Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer