← Search

Amber Juraszek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gulfport, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 138W–149L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history287 matches
W
2026-10-15 · BBTC - Normand · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Vance
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-08 · BBTC - Juraszek · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-05 · BBTC - Normand · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-30 · BBTC - Normand · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamara Moody
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · BBTC - Juraszek · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-24 · BBTC - Juraszek · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-21 · BBTC - Normand · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · Fitzgerald - BBTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Taylor Leatherwood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · BBTC - Normand · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-03 · BBTC - Juraszek · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Vance
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · BBTC - Juraszek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · BBTC - Chowske/Stewart 3.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick McGuffee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.2%
42W–37L · 51.9% of games
4.0
16.4%
9W–46L · 34.2% of games
6.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 54.2% of games
7.5
51.9%
27W–25L · 50.4% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
95.5%
21W–1L · 61.3% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
69 matches
#1 Singles
8%
24 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams