← Search

Joe van Arendonk

— year-end
19 matches · 6W–13L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Joe van Arendonk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2021-07-28 · Chester Men's 4.0 MS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2021-07-21 · Chester Men's 4.0 MS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-15 · Chester Men's 4.0 MS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-07 · Chester Men's 4.0 MS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-06 · Chester Men's 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2021-06-07 · Chester Men's 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2021-06-01 · Chester Men's 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2021-05-25 · Chester Men's 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2019-07-25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2019-07-18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Mark Miller
2019-07-09 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-06-27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams2 teams · 2021–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 79% of the time
#1 Singles
79%
15 matches
#2 Singles
21%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams