Search

Mary Glidden

BRANFORD, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
80 matches · 25W–55L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mary has gone from the 19th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
31.8%
21W–45L · 45.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 55.8% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
Kathryn Pizzuto / Sharon Hawkins
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dani Woods
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Paige Trevethan / Sarah du Plessis
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asiye Kay Underhill
0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Kathy Bennett / Nancy Hawley
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dani Woods
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Kristin Gladney / Marie Mozzi
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asiye Kay Underhill
+0.020better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Svetlana Goletz / Nancy Eastwood
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celia Ponvert
0.021below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Alexi Drago / Andrea Dobras
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maira Rieger
+0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Connie Hurtt / Wendy Login
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maira Rieger
0.030below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Martha Gibson / Deborah Unwin
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn McNally
0.012about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Caroline DiDomenico / Marie Shepherd
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn McNally
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jan Schieren / Linda Roth
2025-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maira Rieger
+0.045better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jarvis
0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Anabel Baluyut / Laurie Lenhart
2021-09-06 · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Catrina Williams
+0.014about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.