← Search

Sheena Clason

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indian Wells, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
7 matches · 1W–6L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history7 matches
L
2024-02-21 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pollish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa McMillan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-14 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pollish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Nini Hillebrand
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-02-07 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pollish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Sollers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-31 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pollish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Price
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-24 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pollish · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucille Lewis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-03-08 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Platis & Pollish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Zoretic
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2020-01-27 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Platis & Pollish · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Cannon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
43%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe