← Search

Gillian Epstein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, NY
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 7W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history23 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Marinelli 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Kupiec
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-23 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Devine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-16 · Smith · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Audrey Sauer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-09 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Archambeau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellie Peavey championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellie Peavey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Crane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-06-26 · Liverpool Wild Cards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-05 · Liverpool Wild Cards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Crane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer