← Search

Amy Haugen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hopkins, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 63W–63L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history126 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Williston Carlson 9:30am · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Zilverberg
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Hurd-ing Cats · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Galvin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · Hurd-ing Cats · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacie Hurd
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-14 · Hurd-ing Cats · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristy Reardan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-03 · Hurd-ing Cats · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Rowe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-26 · Hurd-ing Cats · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Rasmussen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-12 · Hurd-ing Cats · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Galvin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-29 · Hurd-ing Cats · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Dobbins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-11 · Williston Wolden 9:30am · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Zilverberg
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-07 · Williston Wolden 9:30am · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacie Hurd
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-12-06 · LeDoux/Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Hamel
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2023-11-29 · LeDoux/Brown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Brown Cress
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.6% of games
3.5
44.7%
34W–42L · 47.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches
#6 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe