← Search

Janine Robitaille

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
COHOES, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 3W–10L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history13 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Metzger
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Tarantino
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Tarantino
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Tarantino
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-14 · The Dream Team · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Slosberg
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-07 · The Dream Team · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Thomas
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · The Dream Team · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Kasparova
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-27 · Forever Young · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristi Dariano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-21 · Forever Young · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gloria Hessell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-06 · Forever Young · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristi Dariano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-23 · Forever Young · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-16 · Forever Young · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gloria Hessell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
20%
2W–8L · 32.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal