← Search

Zachary Launey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FAIRFAX, VA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 83W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-10-30 · McKeel - PiF 6.5X · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabrielle Guillen mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Velasco mixed championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · Team 4 PiF NOVA 7.0 40 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Rasmussen mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabrielle Guillen championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
Alexander Smith / Natalie Lewis
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabrielle Guillen championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · Team 4 PiF NOVA 7.0 40 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Rasmussen mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-03 · Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Cocozza mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · Team 5 Over Served · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danielle Abraham mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · Team 10 PiF Winter X7.0 18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Velasco mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Team 5 Over Served · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danielle Abraham mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-15 · Team 5 Over Served · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danielle Abraham mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-18 · Team 5 Over Served · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth McCann mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 56.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
70%
14W–6L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
67.7%
21W–10L · 58% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 58.6% of games
8.5mixed
25%
3W–9L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert