← Search

Elizabeth Kelly

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kitty Hawk, NC
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
22 matches · 11W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history22 matches
W
2026-10-30 · Landings - Andersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Fisher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · Landings - Andersen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Givens-Ulmer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-18 · Landings - Andersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsey Andersen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · Landings - Andersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Burtnik
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · Landings - O'Donnell/Buelvas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Littlewood
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-20 · Landings - O'Donnell/Buelvas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Mihok
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-30 · Landings - O'Donnell/Buelvas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Fisher
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-23 · Landings - O'Donnell/Buelvas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Fisher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · Landings - O'Donnell/Buelvas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Littlewood
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2023-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Coplan
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Kimball
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marjorie Blassey
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54% of games
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 45% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer