← Search

Susan Madrigan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brattleboro, VT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 42W–37L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history79 matches
W
2026-09-27 · OC:Still Swinging:Foulk/Weir · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Boyle championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-27 · OC:Still Swinging:Foulk/Weir · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Weir championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · OC:Still Swinging:Foulk/Weir · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Boyle championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-20 · OC:VT Twinkletoes:Nolan/Estey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alison Estey championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · OC:VT Twinkletoes:Nolan/Estey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Weir championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
Default
2026-07-17 · OC:VT Twinkletoes:Nolan/Estey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Boyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · OC:VT Twinkletoes:Nolan/Estey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Weir
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · OC:Still Swinging:Foulk/Weir · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Weir
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · OC:Still Swinging:Foulk/Weir · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Boyle
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-05-10 · OC:Twinkletoes:Foulk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Weir
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-12-07 · BOC:Madrigan/Weir · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joan Weir
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-10-27 · BOC:Madrigan/Weir · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joan Weir
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 66.9% of games
4.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 41.3% of games
8.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.6% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 30% of the time
Singles
30%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova